Male abuse victims with nowhere to go

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/06/07/2920425.htm


Male abuse victims with nowhere to go

By Pamela Medlen
Updated Mon Jun 7, 2010 3:03pm AEST
A couple are in the kitchen, fighting. Their children are listening from the next room.
It's a familiar scene of domestic abuse that's been going on for years.
One of them grabs a pot of boiling liquid from the stovetop and throws it at the other; the pot hits them in the shoulder, knocking them off balance and the victim is scalded.
Most people reading this will assume the victim is a woman but in a number of cases, it will be a man - it is just that most men do not report abuse.
Psychologist Dr Elizabeth Celi says female aggression is on the rise and so is the number of men experiencing abuse and violence from women.
"Men can certainly experience physical violence by female perpetrators and it can range from biting, scratching, punching, kneeing in the groin, throwing hot water on him, domestic objects being projectiles, it can get pretty severe.
"Let's not be fooled into thinking that female perpetrators are any less damaging when it comes to violence."
Research from Edith Cowan University, commissioned by the Men's Advisory Network or MAN, has found men don't report abuse because they have a hard time getting their friends and colleagues to believe them.
"Male victims are just not recognised, they're right off the radar, nobody even acknowledges that they exist," says Gary Bryant, chief executive of MAN.
Mr Bryant says the network commissioned the report when it realised there was very little that existed to assist men who have been abused.

Denial

The study was headed by Alfred Allan, a professor of psychology at Edith Cowan University.
His team surveyed male abuse victims and almost 200 service providers.
Professor Allan says men experience the same sort of abuse that women do, starting with verbal abuse escalating to violent abuse.
"Many men don't actually think about it as abuse, there's a lot of denial. Secondly, even if they understand, they're often very ashamed and think this doesn't happen to a bloke, I should be able to cope and it's very embarrassing to talk to anyone about it, and then they don't know who to go to.
"They're worried they won't be believed because our society doesn't think of men as victims."
The study made several recommendations including a government-funded campaign to raise awareness of the issue to complement the campaigns about violence against women and children.
It also found there should be more services specifically for male victims and provision of training for health and welfare workers to deal with men more effectively.
Dr Celi agrees more specialised services must be aimed at men.
"At the moment, there aren't many because a lot of them have been developed on the back of many decades of helping female victims and male perpetrators.
"Services need to take into account some of those barriers that men experience internally, the shame and the guilt in disclosing first up, because unfortunately more often than not, men are disbelieved and disregarded and they're more likely to retreat and suffer in silence."
Dr Celi says men need appropriate counselling services just as much as women do.
"Where female victims were, prior to the much-needed social education of the past few decades, modern man is experiencing now.
"Men can go to counselling where there's anonymity, confidentiality - a supportive environment where he can re-build his self-worth and learn assertiveness skills and helps him realise where he's a victim."

Long road ahead

The Men's Advisory Network hopes the State Government will look at and implement the report's recommendations, but Gary Bryant is aware there's a long road ahead.
"Hopefully some of the service providers, those that are already providing counselling services for men or maybe some of the domestic violence services that are working with women, will recognise that men are also victims and will be prepared to offer support to them.
"For example, the domestic violence helpline. It'd be great if it was to help both male perpetrators, which is what it's set up for, as well as male victims."
Professor Allan says it's a big task because services for women are already stretched.
"Service providers should probably be trained to deal with men because men will probably seek out help in a different way.
*The Men's Advisory Network will hold an all-day workshop at Gloucester Park on June 16th for service providers. Details can be found on the group's website www.man.org.au.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

May your day, be a Shay Day

Two Choices

What would you do?....you make the choice. Don't look for a punch line, there isn't one. Read it anyway.. My question is: Would you have made the same choice?



At a fundraising dinner for a school that serves children with learning disabilities, the father of one of the students delivered a speech that would never be forgotten by all who attended. After extolling the school and its

dedicated staff, he offered a question:

'When not interfered with by outside influences, everything nature does, is done with perfection.

Yet my son, Shay, cannot learn things as other children do. He cannot understand things as other children do.


Where is the natural order of things in my son?'


The audience was stilled by the query.

The father continued. 'I believe that when a child like Shay, who was mentally and physically disabled comes into the world, an opportunity to realize true human nature presents itself, and it comes in the way other people treat that child.'

Then he told the following story:


Shay and I had walked past a park where some boys Shay knew were playing baseball. Shay asked, 'Do you think they'll let me play?' I knew that most of the boys would not want someone like Shay on their team, but as a father I also understood that if my son were allowed to play, it would give him a much-needed sense of belonging and some confidence to be accepted by others in spite of his handicaps.


I approached one of the boys on the field and asked (not expecting much) if Shay could play. The boy looked around for guidance and said, 'We're losing by six runs and the game is in the eighth inning. I guess he can be on our team and we'll try to put him in to bat in the ninth inning.'



Shay struggled over to the team's bench and, with a broad smile, put on a team shirt. I watched with a small tear in my eye and warmth in my heart. The boys saw my joy at my son being accepted.

In the bottom of the eighth inning, Shay's team scored a few runs but was still behind by three.

In the top of the ninth inning, Shay put on a glove and played in the right field. Even though no hits came his way, he was obviously ecstatic just to be in the game and on the field, grinning from ear to ear as I waved to him from the stands.

In the bottom of the ninth inning, Shay's team scored again.

Now, with two outs and the bases loaded, the potential winning run was on base and Shay was scheduled to be next at bat.


At this juncture, do they let Shay bat and give away their chance to win the game?

Surprisingly, Shay was given the bat.. Everyone knew that a hit was all but impossible because Shay didn't even know how to hold the bat properly, much less connect with the ball.


However, as Shay stepped up to the

plate, the pitcher, recognizing that the other team was putting winning aside for this moment in Shay's life, moved in a few steps to lob the ball in softly so Shay could at least make contact.

The first pitch came and Shay swung clumsily and missed.

The pitcher again took a few steps forward to toss the ball softly towards Shay.

As the pitch came in, Shay swung at the ball and hit a slow ground ball right back to the pitcher.


The game would now be over.

The pitcher picked up the soft grounder and could have easily thrown the ball to the first baseman.

Shay would have been out and that would have been the end of the game.


Instead, the pitcher threw the ball right over the first baseman's head, out of reach of all team mates.

Everyone from the stands and both teams started yelling, 'Shay, run to first!

Run to first!'

Never in his life had Shay ever run that far, but he made it to first base.

He scampered down the baseline, wide-eyed and startled.


Everyone yelled, 'Run to second, run to second!'

Catching his breath, Shay awkwardly ran towards second, gleaming and struggling to make it to the base.

B y the time Shay rounded towards second base, the right fielder had the ball . the smallest guy on their team who now had his first chance to be the hero for his team.

He could have thrown the ball to the second-baseman for the tag, but he understood the pitcher's intentions so he, too, intentionally threw the ball high and far over the third-baseman's head.

Shay ran toward third base deliriously as the runners ahead of him circled the bases toward home.


All were screaming, 'Shay, Shay, Shay, all the Way Shay'


Shay reached third base because the opposing shortstop ran to help him by turning him in the direction of third base, and shouted, 'Run to third!

Shay, run to third!'


As Shay rounded third, the boys from both teams, and the spectators, were on their feet screaming, 'Shay, run home! Run home!'

Shay ran to home, stepped on the plate, and was cheered as the hero who hit the grand slam and won the game for his team


'That day', said the father softly with tears now rolling down his face, 'the boys from both teams helped bring a piece of true love and humanity into this world'.


Shay didn't make it to another summer. He died that winter, having never forgotten being the hero and making me so happy, and coming home and seeing his Mother tearfully embrace her little hero of the day!


AND NOW A LITTLE FOOT NOTE TO THIS STORY:

We all send thousands of jokes through the e-mail without a second thought, but when it comes to sending messages about life choices, people hesitate.

The crude, vulgar, and often obscene pass freely through cyberspace, but public discussion about decency is too often suppressed in our schools and workplaces.




If you're thinking about forwarding this message, chances are that you're probably sorting out the people in your address book who aren't the 'appropriate' ones to receive this type of message Well, the person who sent you this believes that we all can make a difference.


We all have thousands of opportunities every single day to help realize the 'natural order of things.'

So many seemingly trivial interactions between two people present us with a choice:

Do we pass along a little spark of love and humanity or do we pass up those opportunities and leave the world a little bit colder in the process?


A wise man once said every society is judged by how it treats it's least fortunate amongst them.


You now have two choices:

1. Delete

2. Forward

May your day, be a Shay Day.



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Forgotten victims of home abuse

http://www.oneinthree.com.au/news/2010/7/4/forgotten-victims-of-home-abuse.html


Forgotten victims of home abuse

DateSunday, July 4, 2010
Canberra Times (Australia), July 4, 2010
Intimate partner abuse betrays the trust within relationships and can destroy families. The simple fact is that violence is never acceptable, but for decades governments and service providers have focused exclusively on protecting women and children.
Men, however, remained the silent victims of domestic violence.
According to the most recent Australian Bureau of Statistics Personal Safety Survey, a third of assaults in the home were perpetrated by women on a male victim.
The recently launched One in Three Campaign aims to raise awareness not only of the needs of male victims of family violence and abuse, but of the fact that they exist at all.
Men's Advisory Network executive officer Gary Bryant said the issue of intimate partner abuse against men was not widely recognised by the community or support services.
Mr Bryant stressed he was not seeking to divert funding from support for female abuse victims, but said there was also a significant number of male victims without access to vital support and counselling services.
"Men have traditionally been seen only as the perpetrators of domestic violence," he said.
"There is very little recognition that they can also be abused.
"Partly that has been because men are reluctant to admit they have been abused. "They might feel embarrassed or ashamed to ask for help." Those who did ask for help faced further barriers, Mr Bryant said.
"Police and hospital emergency services do not expect to see abused men and do not know how to identify or deal with these kinds of cases," he said. "It is completely off their radar." Edith Cowan University's recent Intimate Partner Abuse of Men Report found men would find it easier to seek help and disclose abuse if there was greater public acknowledgment that men could also be abuse victims and appropriate services were offered to them.
"One of the biggest problems is for men to recognise domestic violence," a service provider said in the report. "To try and see themselves as victims is very difficult it is really kind of feminising. "The way that we generally conceptualise domestic violence it is all about men hitting women." The report says services to victims of domestic violence are skewed towards this gender- biased perception of female victims and male perpetrators.
The One in Three Campaign, based on the report, argues established social and cultural stereotypes about masculinity and violence also reinforced the view that men could not be victims of abuse.
"A lot of it is the pride factor and the cultural issues of, you know, that that just doesn't happen to men," a service provider said.
"I think that it is an Australian stereotype where we are supposed to be all strong and silent." The report found evidence this stereotype was also in operation in government, health and welfare services designed for victims of domestic violence.
"Some of those gender biases might have operated within the field in ways that have prevented the development of services for male victims or of family violence services that are designed to serve both male and female victims," the report said.
A similar range of services should be provided to men as were currently supplied to women, including counselling and support services, gender-sensitive services specifically for men, accommodation services, help lines and crisis response, community education and prevention programs and specialist family violence services.
In the ACT, all funding for domestic violence services comes under the auspices of Minister for Women Joy Burch and is part of the ACT Women's Plan: "That the ACT provides strategies to break the cycle of violence against women and their children and to instil an anti-violence message".
A spokesman for Ms Burch said these services included Australia's only men's sexual assault service the Canberra Rape Crisis Centre's Service Assisting Male Survivors of Sexual Assault. But the program's executive officer, Veronica Wensing, said the service was almost exclusively used by men who were sexually assaulted as children.
Other services for male victims of intimate partner abuse included the Canberra Men's Centre, the Canberra Fathers' and Children's Service and the Domestic Violence Crisis Service.
In 2008-09, 8per cent of people accessing the service were male victims of violence, while 2per cent were men who used violence. The other 90per cent of clients were women and children.
Ms Burch's spokesman quoted the statistic that women were three times more likely to be victims of intimate partner abuse, but then disputed the same statistic when used by the One in Three Campaign.
"The recent One in Three Campaign, attesting that one in three victims of domestic violence are men, does not make it clear where this figure has been derived from and it overestimates men's victimisation compared to our most reliable population surveys," he said.
"The intimate partner violence that women experience is more likely to be part of a pattern of coercion and control and to cause fear, injury and death." When Ms Burch announced increased funding for domestic violence services in the 2010 ACT budget, men were implicitly excluded through the language used.
"We know that the level of sexual assault and family violence against women is significantly under-reported," she said.
"However, the Government's coordinated Family Violence Intervention Program and Sexual Assault Reform Program have provided increased confidence to women victims of violence." The One in Three Campaign says, ironically, advertising campaigns and government programs such as these designed to prevent violence against women have reinforced entrenched views about male perpetrators and female victims in the community and service providers. "Regrettably, while well- intentioned, many past efforts to reduce family violence against women have inadvertently used incorrect or misleading statistics which unfairly stigmatise men and boys as violent and abusive, while simultaneously denying or downplaying the existence of male victims of violence," the campaign's website says.
"For decades well-meaning governments and NGOs have presented the myth to the public that family violence is only something that men do to women. This message has prevented the development of more comprehensive policies, programs, services, campaigns and funding to cater for male as well as female victims of family violence and abuse." The One in Three Campaign wants state and Federal governments to include all victims and perpetrators.
For help contact Samaritan House: Single men (62476691); Minosa House: Single men over 18 (61633701); Mary's Place: Single men (62991619); CANFaCS: Men with children (61234000).
YWCA Families Experiencing Accommodation Transition in Tuggeranong (FEATT): 62918333 YWCA Family Housing Outreach Service northside (FHOS): 62426211 Saint Vincent de Paul's Family Services: 62087330 Service Assisting Male Survivors of Sexual Assault (SAMSSA): 62627377 or 24-hour Hotline, 62472525.
Provided By: Financial Times Limited - Asia Africa Intelligence Wire Index Terms: General News ; Society & Social Affairs ; Statistics Record Number: WCTS79861961 Copyright 2010. All Rights Reserved.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

UK Corrupt Courts

THE MINISTRY OF INJUSTICE KNOWS EXACTLY HOW CORRUPT THE COURTS ARE

The Government is totally corrupt and uses the courts, police, inland revenue, customs & excise, local government as enforcement goons. You are secretly enslaved by the monarchy, and please remember they have had hundreds of years of control to practice and refine their technique.

Democracy, law, justice are just devices to fool and con you into compliance, in fact you are just a busy bee collecting honey for the queen’s agents to steal

Wake up.

This list is for the authorities to know how many citizens know the truth, who the trouble-makers are (activists, realists, victims). In truth they are shit scared the internet cum tinternet has blown their cover. And what’s more they are to fecking late the cat’s out of the bag! For those who know!

Because of their arrogance and old boys networks, they now realise the old boys they relied on have been gently screwing them for years and now we have a financial collapse. One thing you should know: money does not disappear. It buys property and assets. Where is it? After all, we keep honey in jars! Where is the stolen money now!

SOURCE






Do we have any real leaders? You can recognize them if they are marginalized, slandered and anathema to the mass media. Our real leaders are the people they slander, bankrupt and imprison or kill. {Henry Makow}

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

One-third of babies born out of wedlock

May I suggest that over half of the babies born in New Zealand are born out of wedlock. Sadly society wonders why children don't understand balance and respect.Western government systems promote the fractured family business because insidious  Family Court judges, lawyers and bent psychologists need money to pay the golf club fees. Blood money. Poor children and you think this generation is bad, you ain't seen nothing yet!

http://www.theage.com.au/national/onethird-of-babies-born-out-of-wedlock-20100705-zxn9.html

The Age (Melbourne)
6 July 2010

One-third of babies born out of wedlock
By Adele Horin and Erik Jensen

Nothing short of a revolution has swept through the institutions of marriage and family in the past 30 years, says the director of the Australian Institute of Family Studies, Alan Hayes.

The most striking change is the rise in babies born out of wedlock. More than a third of babies born in 2008 (34.4 per cent) were to mothers who were not married, an increase from 8.3 per cent in 1970.

"For many children it's been a good revolution, but it depends on the extent to which they are in safe and stable homes," Professor Hayes said.

The big rise in ex-nuptial births was to cohabiting couples, he said. The proportion born to single women on their own had remained stable since the early 1990s.

"It's difficult to generalise about the effects on the children," Professor Hayes said. "It depends on whether the cohabiting relationship is long-term and stable, whether it leads to marriage, or whether it is fragile and part of a series of relationships."

Professor Hayes will report today on the modern family at the annual conference of the Australian Institute of Family Studies, which has charted the changes since it opened its doors 30 years ago.

It was more important to focus on how a family functioned than on its form, Professor Hayes said, on whether parenting was harsh and inconsistent, and whether relationships "disappeared before children's eyes". It was easier for governments to support families irrespective of their form than to try to change marriage rates.

Rebecca Huntley, director of Ipsos Mackay Research, said for many members of the cohabiting Generation Y, the sign of commitment was the decision to have children and to buy a house together. But later, when they could afford it, the couple splashed out on a big, ostentatious wedding.

"They see the wedding as a party with 150 friends," she said. "For their parents' generation a wedding was the licence to buy a house and have the children."

Another sign of the revolution is the proportion of couples who have lived together before marrying, which reached 78 per cent in 2008, compared with 23 per cent in 1980. Both parents are much more likely to be in work, with 63 per cent of mothers of dependent children in jobs (mostly part-time) compared with 43 per cent in 1981.
--

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Absent dads owe billions in unpaid child support

  False allegations made in 2001 by an unscrupulous maternal family obliterated the close loving bonds of love that I enjoyed in a relationship with my two dear daughters. However with that said, I have paid child support even though I have not had meaningful access to either of them.The money does not go to them, it goes to the wayward government creeps. It is hard paying a gender bias system without enjoying the rewards of my children. It was so easy for my ex to manipulate the sick judicial system I can only assume that the child support debtors bolted before the police locked them up and a Family Court said they were mental. This country is a tragic mess with more social problems than any other country of similar size. Who in their right mind can say they proud to be a kiwi. This country is a corrupt cess pit !!


Absent dads owe billions in unpaid child support



  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Barbara Kay: You’re male. You must be a pervert

Barbara Kay: You’re male. You must be a pervert
July 2, 2010 – 9:05 am
 
 
 
: CARL DE SOUZA/AFP/Getty Images)
.  CARL DE SOUZA/AFP/Getty Images)
Look, there are men in this line! They must all be sickos

In an interesting news item out of Britain, a man has received about £3,000 in costs and damages combined for sex discrimination by British Airways (BA).
Mirko Fischer, 33, and his pregnant wife were on a London to Luxembourg flight in April 2009. Deciding she preferred the window, she exchanged her middle seat with her husband, thus seating him adjacent to a child travelling alone.
A flight attendant, who later claimed ignorance of the fact that Mr. Fischer was with his wife, informed him that he must return to his original seat, as it was BA policy not to allow adult men to sit next to an unaccompanied minor. After some discussion, Mr. Fischer did ultimately return to his seat, unwilling to make a spectacle of himself, but felt “embarrassed, humiliated and angry.”
For its part, BA conceded fault in not realizing Mr. Fischer was with his wife, but defended the general policy. A spokesman said, “We had 75,000 children fly with us last year and it is an issue we take very seriously.”
BA is not the only airline with that policy. It’s a common practice. In a September 2007  post in thehich after se pages in which I mused over airline inconsistencies in profiling discrimination — yes to all adult men, no to potential terrorists — I quoted an expert witness in aviation disputes: “You have to make generalizations for the safety of a child.” She cited what is apparently a well-known adage in airline circles: “No regulation in aviation takes effect without somebody’s blood on it.”
The only inference to draw from that statement is that unaccompanied minors have been physically abused on airplanes by adult men in the past, and therefore the policy is well justified. If that is indeed the case, then airlines have opened the door in principle to profiling in general.
Yet strangely, even though there’s “somebody’s blood” – more than 3,000 somebodies to be precise – on the lack of a profile policy monitoring the kind of people most likely to shed more blood, airlines still frisk little old ladies and pointedly ignore the terror profile guy with the one-way ticket and the nervous manner.
In any case, I have to wonder exactly how much “blood” has been shed on airlines by adult men sitting next to children. Does anyone have any actual statistics? Because it occurs to me that even the most committed pedophile would have to be quite a moron to take a chance hitting on a child on an airplane.
After all, men flying alone on airplanes are not exactly drunken bowery bums in sleazy porn theatres with no reputation to protect. The typical “respectable” pervert chooses his victim carefully, with a plan for isolating and controlling his target. He most definitely has an escape plan. Proximity and apparent opportunity alone would hardly be enough of an incentive to overcome the enormous risks attached to airplane overtures.
This isn’t 1954, after all, when any man in a business suit is considered trustworthy. The opposite. No men are “innocent” any more, not even the 99% of decent men to whom it would never occur to be anything but protective to a child alone. All are suspect in society’s eyes, even though something like 20% of sexual abuse is perpetrated on children by women.
Children nowadays are very well trained by their parents and teachers on the subject of “touching” and the need for wariness with strangers. Touching a child inappropriately in a tight little space surrounded by others with no possible escape seems to me the equivalent of groping a kid in a police station. You’d have to be a complete obsessive to take the chance. I suppose some men are – just like some jihadists we could name are obsessive about their desires.
When you think about it, even though Mr Fischer is quite right to label the policy sex discrimination, he was better off having swapped seats with his wife. Such is the fear and hysteria around child abuse, he might have been at greater risk than any fear-hyped child. Imagine if, having dropped his pen, and feeling for it on the floor, he accidentally brushed his fingers against the child’s leg. The kid screams, “Don’t touch me!” Three hundred eyes swivel his way, the cabin crew come rushing over, the pilot alerts the destination security, the poor sap is hauled off the plane protesting his innocence to no avail, and his life is ruined.
The onus should not be on adult men to carry out the responsibility of airline crews. Either airlines should refuse unaccompanied minors or they should take full responsibility for them, if necessary designating a special area beside the cabin personnel.
If their policy remains one of merely minimizing the risk, however, consistency should prevail. If profiling for one child’s security is justifiable, then profiling for the security of a whole airplane of people should be as well. What good would it do a kid to remain ungroped if the whole plane blows up with him in it?
National Post

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS