Who the hell does this judge think it is? How dare a mere human declare in a position of power that our creator is wrong! I hope this deluded judge gets treatment for its bad mental health.
After judge tells arrested pro-life activist ‘your God’s wrong,’ lawyers file appeal | LifeSiteNews.com
After judge tells arrested pro-life activist ‘your God’s wrong,’ lawyers file appeal | LifeSiteNews.com
Comments(0)
Sex offender blames twin brother.
As my readers know, I get real angry when I see manipulative lying scum of the earth slip through the sick system so they can apply their pedophile poison onto innocent and vulnerable children. In the ideal world, I would be a judge sentencing this creep. He would serve 10 years hard labour then I might think about his release. Then again on the day I could sentence the depraved animal to death.
New Zealander's must realize that we are gold medalists at child abuse and the judiciary couldn't give a flying frig! It's way past time we got real tough on these kid fuckers.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/6699145/Sex-offender-blames-twin-brother
A sex offender who faked a CV to work with children fobbed off a suspicious principal who confronted him about his convictions by saying he had a twin brother.
The man, revealed as Te Rito Henry Miki, 40, today admitted using a false CV and birth certificate to work in six schools, two of which were in Auckland.
He also pleaded guilty to four charges of breaching a protection order, which prevented him working with children.
Miki's name suppression was lifted at the Auckland District Court this morning, but his aliases and the names of the schools at which he worked are still suppressed.
Judge Philippa Sinclair convicted Miki and remanded him in custody until sentencing on May 18. A new forgery charge laid by police today will also be dealt with then.
Education Minister Hekia Parata said today she was pleased to hear Miki had plead guilty.
"I think it gives certainty for the whole school sector but for those schools in particular as to what the current situation is."
She supported suppression of the names of the schools Miki had worked at.
"I don't think it is necessary for the public to know, the school are taking care of their particular school communities."
Court documents show that at least two principals became suspicious of Miki since he began working in schools in 2007.
At one school, Miki faked a brain tumour and said he was leaving the teaching profession when the principal aired his concerns.
The next school decided to employ Miki despite being told about his previous convictions and multiple aliases while doing reference checks.
"The principal has confronted the defendant who dismissed the claims stating he had a twin brother who was responsible for the convictions," a court summary reads.
It wasn't until the police became involved with Miki that his true identity was discovered by the principal who then terminated his employment.
After Miki left, the principal then went through his belongings and discovered documentation in another man's name.
The man was a friend of Miki's who had a legitimate teaching qualification.
Miki applied to change his friend's name, then notified the organisation who granted the qualification and the New Zealand Teaching Council of the name change, which he used to gain employment.
Despite these discoveries, it appears neither principal nor the police notified the Teaching Council about Miki's actions.
He was subsequently able to teach under the same alias at two Auckland schools, one for nearly more than a year.
Miki was finally arrested when he was identified by a member of the public earlier this year, when she reportedly spotted him driving a van-load of schoolchildren.
The person, who knew of the man's criminal history, rang the school principal and because she understood he was using a false name, provided the school with a photograph that confirmed his identity.
By that time, Miki had worked at three schools in the Bay of Plenty, one in Taranaki, and two in Auckland.
The schools involved have a combined roll of 2258 children.
At the time of the alleged offending, he was supposed to be adhering to an extended supervision order that normally requires an offender to be subject to parole-type conditions for up to 10 years after release.
A ministerial inquiry into how Miki was hired to work at multiple schools was on track to make an interim report at the end of the month, Parata said.
Inquiry head Mel Smith had found it difficult to speak to key witnesses with the case before the court, prompting him to seek an extension.
Former chief executive of the Education Review Office, Judith Aitken, has been appointed to help Smith with the inquiry.
Judge Philippa Cunningham supports child abuse.
This mad judge should be in the dock for sentencing. What the hell was the mad maggot thinking. Why the taxpayer pay these deluded creeps is beyond my comprehension?!
Comedian child sex case reviewed
A High Court judge is deciding whether a well-known Kiwi comedian who admitted performing a sex act on his four-year-old daughter will be resentenced for his crime.
The man pleaded guilty in March last year to performing an indecent act on a child, but was discharged without conviction by Judge Philippa Cunningham in August.
Judge Cunningham said the consequences of a conviction would outweigh the gravity of the offence against the four-year-old, noting the man was a talented comedian who made people laugh.
Protesters picketed outside the court at the time.
On Wednesday the Crown appealed to Justice Murray Gilbert at Auckland's High Court to grant a judicial review of the case.
The comedian's lawyer, Marie Dyhrberg, told NZ Newswire that Justice Gilbert was likely to announce his decision later this month.
If he decides Judge Cunningham made an error in law in discharging the man, the comedian may be sent back to court to be sentenced again.
The man has permanent name suppression to protect the victim.
The man got into bed with his partner and their daughter after a night out drinking.
He pulled down the girl's pyjama pants and pull-up nappy and started kissing her.
When his partner awoke, he told her: "I thought it was you."
She called police.
The couple have separated and the man has supervised visits with his two daughters.
FFS! A sex offender drove a school bus?
Only in New Zealand! No wonder we are gold medalists in child abuse. The callous bureaucratic machine does not care about kiwi children. Mistake after mistake. Poor kids.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10796359
A convicted child sex offender who used to work as a school principal has been jailed for further offending against a child - and details have emerged of how he was mistakenly allowed to work as a school bus driver.
Despite his background, Maurice William Cudby, 72, was cleared by the Land Transport Safety Authority to drive a school bus in the 1990s, the High Court at Wanganui was told yesterday.
Cudby was appearing in court for sentence on six counts of sexual offending against a boy, occurring over nine years from 1998 to 2007.
Cudby had earlier pleaded guilty to indecently assaulting a boy aged under 12, inducing a boy under 12 to perform an indecent act, two counts of sexual violation, sexual violation and indecently assaulting a boy aged between 12-16.
Justice Jillian Mallon sentenced Cudby to 12 years jail, saying he was to serve no less than six years.
The raft of offending against the boy began just after Cudby was released from prison for sexual offending against seven young girls.
n 1993 he was convicted of 12 charges representing indecencies against seven girls aged between seven and 10, committed between 1977 and 1993 when he was a school principal and sole charge teacher of a rural school. For that offending, he received a sentence of five years imprisonment.
Yesterday, the court heard how LTSA checks failed to identify Cudby's past and he got a job driving a school bus in the late 1990s.
Cudby said he had listed his sexual convictions on his application but somehow they were either ignored or had slipped through the cracks.
However, his past came to light after a member of the public recognised him as a known child sex offender. They were horrified he was driving a school bus and reported him.
The bus company immediately dismissed him, the court was told.
Justice Mallon said Cudby had groomed the boy from the time the child was six years old until he was aged 15.
The judge described the grooming as an aggravating factor, a huge breach of trust and repeating offending.
"It seems that you learned nothing from your earlier offending even though you received treatment in prison for your sexual offending."
Justice Mallon said Cudby simply could not stop himself.
"Apart from pleading guilty, there is nothing else that demonstrates any remorse at all.
"You were predatory and opportunistic... you have a very limited appreciation of your offending,"she said.
Cudby's age alone was not a mitigating factor, she said.
"So it's good that you pleaded guilty. Your sustained grooming of this boy has caused him serious harm. You have caused all these children serious harm."
-
So who's your daddy?
So who’s the daddy? Ethics dilemma over sperm donor boom
Independent (UK) 2 April 2012
The gift of life is not immune to pecuniary incentives. Charities working with sperm and egg donors report a boom in enquiries from potential volunteers as new regulations allow fertility clinics to make more generous payments. From today, men will be able to collect £35 per visit for their sperm, up from £15, and women will be paid £750 for their eggs, a threefold rise on the previous amount of £250. The new rates, agreed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) following a public consultation last year, are intended to boost the number of donors to meet rising demand. But they have also focused attention on the question of transparency in donation after decades in which the biological origins of tens of thousands of children have been kept secret. Donor anonymity was removed in 2005 and children born from gametes (sperm and eggs) used since that date will have the right to learn the identity of their biological parent when they reach the age of 18. But they can only do so if the parents who brought them up tell them about their origins. A survey conducted prior to the law change found 28 per cent of children conceived from donor sperm and 40 per cent conceived from donor eggs had been told by the age of seven. An inquiry by the Nuffield Council for Bioethics is to examine why parents choose not to tell their children and whether the information is so important, for medical as well as psychological reasons, that doctors and social workers should be involved.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/so-whos-the-daddy-ethics-dilemma-over-sperm-donor-boom-7606835.html
Women more likely to be perpetrators of abuse as well as victims
I was once assaulted by an ex partner when she pushed me threw a back door window . I badly cut my arm. I told them at the hospital that I tripped and fell because I knew the feminist driven police would laugh at me. Is there a female assaults male charge in the criminal justice act judge dread? Does the Western World know what gender balance means? What chance do our future generations have? Sad stuff.
Say no more!
Women more likely to be perpetrators of abuse as well as victims
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)