The Green Thing
Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days."The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations."She was right -- our generation didn't have the green thing in its day.
Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.But she was right.We didn't have the green thing in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy gobbling machine burning up 220 volts – wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.
Back then, we had one TV, or radio, in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana . In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn. We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.
We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.
Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.
But isn't it sad that the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?
Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smart-arse young person.
Something to Remember: Don't make old People mad. We don't like being old in the first place, so it doesn't take much to piss us off.
The green thing
What kind of personality makes false allegations
As a victim of false allegations of child sexual abuse and domestic violence I found this article interesting. What I find more offensive than the false court testismony is the sad fact that the corrupt judicial and political systems don't allow a falsely accused father to ever clear his name as a good dad. The law works on fear and I can assure you our politicial and legal systems are nothing more than feminist weapons of war.
Take my arm bitch but don't call me a kid f##ker dad.
I have faith that the Lord will avenge my terrible injustice.
http://www.shrink4men.com/2011/08/24/false-allegations-in-divorce-and-custody-battles-the-personality-types-of-false-accusers-and-the-falsely-accused/
10 Incredible Facts About The Criminal Brain.
Hi,
We would love to share with you an article that we just posted on our own blog! “10 Incredible Facts About the CriminalBrain” is linked below and could be a fun way for your readers to gothrough it.
(http://www.criminaljusticedegreesguide.com/features/10-incredible-facts-about-the-criminal-brain.html)
It has been a sincere pleasure to read yourgreat content.
Sincerely,
JaySmith
False allegations hurt good dads everywhere.
False allegations hurt a decent father, but the New Zealand Family Court enjoys destroying innocent dads like myself. This country owes me big time. My story is sad and built around false allegations of child sexual abuse. Unlike the NZ High Court at least the British High Court gets it right.How come we don't come down hard on lying women? Maybe a High Court judge or our silly Justice Minister could answer my question? Yeah right -they don't care!
Read more
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028908/Daughter-race-horse-trainer-
A top racehorse trainer 'coached' her young daughter to say her father had
sexually abused her, the High Court heard today.
Twisted Victoria Haigh manufactured sex abuse allegations about ex-partner
David Tune then encouraged her daughter, now seven, to repeat them.
Ms Haigh, who was locked in a custody battle with Mr Tune, hired a private
investigator and together they spread the malicious accusations via e-mail
and over the internet.
But Sir Nicholas Wall, President of the Family Division of the High Court,
said the claims were untrue and Ms Haigh's actions had been 'wholly
contrary' to her daughter's interests.
He said he had decided to sit in open court so that the public could be told
that Mr Tune was 'not a paedophile' and made an order that Ms Haigh could
not make any application in relation to her daughter without his permission
for two years.
Sir Nicholas ruled that Ms Haigh and Mr Tune could be identified, but he
said the little girl - referred to as 'x' in court - should not be named.
He told the court: 'Allegations of sexual abuse were first made by the
mother and not by x.
'These were false and the mother knew them to be false.'
He added: 'X was coached by the mother to make allegations of sexual abuse
against the father.'
Sir Nicholas said two judges examined the case at previous High Court
hearings and both found that Mr Tune was not a paedophile and had not
sexually abused his daughter.
'The first judge found that allegations of sexual abuse made against the
father of a young child were not just untrue but manufactured by the child's
mother, who then caused her daughter to repeat them,' said Sir Nicholas.'
'Because the mother was wholly incapable of fostering a relationship between
her daughter and the child's father, refused to accept the judge's findings
and continued to assert that the father was a paedophile, a second judge
found that her mother had caused the child significant harm.'
The little girl, now living with her father, was subject to a care plan
organised by a local authority in, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, the hearing
in London was told.
Judges have previously heard evidence about the case at private hearings.
He added: 'The child's mother is wholly unable to accept the court's verdict
and, with the misguided assistance of Elizabeth Watson has unlawfully and in
breach of court orders put into the public domain via email and the internet
a series of unwarranted and scandalous allegations about the father and
others.
'She has repeated the untruth that the father is a paedophile and - without
a scintilla of evidence - has attacked the good faith of all the
professionals who had had any contact with the case.
'I have read all the papers in the case carefully. The father of the child,
who may be named, is not a paedophile and he has not sexually abused his
daughter. Two judges have so found.'
He added: 'I have come to the conclusion that ... I should ... give a public
judgment in which I explain, having read all the papers in the case, that I
have reached the same conclusion as the two previous judges.'
Sir Nicholas went on: 'These proceedings have had a serious effect on the
life of the father and have threatened the stability of the child. Her
mother's actions are wholly contrary to her interests.
'The father is entitled to tell the world, and the world is entitled to
know, that he is not a paedophile, that he has not sexually abused his
daughter and that the allegations made against him are false.'
END
--
Our kid care doesn't rate
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/5441231/Our-kid-care-doesn-t-rate
And they call this place the land of milk and honey. What a disgraceful statistic for such a tiny nation.
Man this country is the pits for children and I blame continuous callous socialists governments who couldn't give a toss about the serious plight many kiwi kids find themselves in.
One in four NZ Children living in poverty.
The countless government paid commissioners, lawyers, psychologists, social workers and overpaid judges all make a healthy profit from the dysfunctional family file number. No thought is ever given to addressing the issues like fatherlessness that trigger most anti social child behaviours, as all resources are directed at the destruction of the father. Many dads simply walk away from their children, because they know that fighting for access and custodial matters in the feminist driven family court is an exercise in futility.Unhappy children are nurtured in hate lessons by the cruel and evil family court. Often the family court extends the misery for the paternal client and custodial cases can last 10 years. Mine did. Thanks Christchurch family court. How was that good for my four children Justice Minister? How much did my case cost the country Justice Minister? Was it $2 or $3 million??





